I don’t have a budget as such - just as much as a normal 250gb would cost .
I don’t want to spend extra on a raid/mirror . I might prefer getting a 16mb buffer WD if the price difference between that and hitachi was not too much (yes i know hitachi is winning the benchmarks) but the major final deciding factor here would be reliabilaty .
( my other 4-5 seagates/maxtors have given me no probs. while i used them for about 4-5 years before disposing them off )
Are those that cheap. Well then i would get those over the WD n seagate. Agrees with Chaos. Get 2 of them n have fun. You will then have 0.5TB of storage.
How can you both agree and disagree at the same time. He said get 2 HDD and MIRROR them, not use them together for 500GB. Mirroring means to replicate the data on both HDD via RAID. SO he still has 250GB even with 2 HDD.
Hi - people , like i already said , i don’t want want to mirror as it still does not provide that much reliabilaty and i would try to backup my most important data on dvds - i just want my drive to last atleast 4-5 years - without crashes/bad sectors .
A little info on reliabilaty that i have gathered from online reviews :
User reviews on Newegg : I read first 50 reviews of both drives : WD - 2-3 (out of 50) drives stopped working within 1 year
Hitachi - 7-8 drives stopped working within 1 year
Storagereview reliabilaty survey : It indicates better reliabilaty of hitachi but says no. of samples too few
It does. Looking at the probability of both drives failing at once as against the chances of a single drive failing, you would theoretically get data reliability that goes by several orders of magnitude by mirroring.