AMD: Next CPU architecture will be completely different

New architecture promises to be completely different from Phenom, and capable of brand new features

AMD has squeezed an awful lot out of its AMD64 architecture since it first materialised in 2003, and even the latest K10 core used in the Phenom chips uses basically the same architecture with a different cache system. However, the company says that it’s now looking at a whole new architecture for the next generation of CPUs.

AMD’s technical director of sales and marketing for EMEA, Giuseppe Amato, told Custom PC that ‘if I look at the next generation architecture of our CPU, then it will definitely not be, how can I say, comparable with the Phenom. It will look completely different.’ Amato was unable to give us any specific details of the new architecture, but did add that it would ‘solve problems that today we think can never be addressed by hardware.’

The AMD64 architecture introduced us to new features such as 64-bit desktop computing, as well as the integrated memory controller. It gave Intel’s NetBurst architecture a good for its money too, consistently out-performing Pentium 4 chips in our benchmarks. However, the new AMD64-based Phenom chips are unable to compete with Intel’s new Core 2 Quad chips at the top end of the market, with AMD positioning even the top-end Phenom chips at a similar price to Intel’s Core 2 Quad Q6600.

Intel also decided to go back to the drawing board in terms of its CPU architecture when it went from NetBurst to Core, which was interestingly more like Intel’s ancient P6 Pentium Pro core than a Pentium 4 chip. What would you like to see in a new CPU architecture from AMD? And what sort of problems could be solved by the architecture that ‘we think can never be addressed by hardware?’ Let us know your thoughts.

source: Homepage | Custom PC

all talk. show us something that’s actually faster :no:

I beg to refer.. The reason why Intel had to finally come up with such wonderful processors is because of AMD..cos with the release of proccies based on A64 architecture, AMD had really destroyed Intels dominance. The market share was fast going down and finally Intel realized that their A$$ could be on fire soon..which lead them back to the drawing board and brought us C2D..so..wait and watch my dear friend..AMD will do it again !!. If AMD is gone..intel will dfntly go back to their good old ways of giving us CRAP ..so pray for AMD to survive.

^^… No offence. But all I can read is… WAS and WILL.

Besides, apart from Pentium4 and Netburst debacle… I can’t recall Intel churning out utter crap processors. I keep hearing that a lot, but beside that one particular architecture I don’t remember any previous Intel processors to be “crap” compared to alternative processors offered at their respective time.

I’m all for AMD, I really hope that they do good. As a consumer, this competition ultimately benefits us. But like greenhorn I would rather see some hard proof than paper talks.

yes we need proof

amd is still the best bang for the buck period

only in lower Rs 4000/- bracket.

all else it is spanked on butt by c2d

Sigh !!

10char