Am planning to buy any of this model with in a month or so… bit confused between these two models…and do u have any idea hw much it will cost in chennai including tax…i checked in ebay there its around 30k:)
Thanking u in advance
Manu:)
I would suggest you get the Canon D450 instead. Or if you want Nikon at all costs, get the Nikon D80 for about 29k (grey market). The Canon D450 has a lot of advantages over the D40x like Live view, 3.0" screen, built in AF motor, etc.
The reason I will not suggest either the D40 or the D40x, is because they do not have a built in AF motor and you can only use DX lenses to get AF functionality. If you use any of the older lenses like the cheap but highly useful 50mm f1.8 lens, it will only work with MF. Also all older lenses will work only with MF, no AF option. The D80 does NOT suffer from this problem and it will AF with all AF lenses.
The D80 also has one of the best viewfinders in a DSLR. And at 29k, it is much better than the D40x. If you are on a tight budget, then get the D40 only as the 40x just has more memory card clogging pixels.
Otherwise a Canon 350D/400D is a better option, but you need to ditch the useless kit lens and get the 18-55mm IS lens if you want decent snaps.
^^The canon doesn’t have a built in camera lens motor. All canon lenses have the motor in them unlike Nikon. You can also look at the entry level 1000D that Canon recently launched. Its expected to be one of the cheapest SLRs on the block.
If you must have D40 or D40x, I’d suggest the D40. D40x/D60 just has more pixels which means more noise. Also it only has a 1/100 flash sync speed whereas the D40 has the standard 1/200th.
well i havent seen the nikon D80 for 29k yet ,the best price i have seen in the grey are 38k.also the price for the canon eos 450d(Rebel XSi ) is 38k with kit lens.
^^ Hmm not a bad buy at all. The only negative I can think off is that you won’t find too many service centers who could repair the cam. (Spare parts will be a real problem)
But still in built IS (that works with EVERY lens you attach to your camera !) and Live View without AF delay are killer features. Highly recommended camera. And though the Kit lens isn’t a great lens, it is reasonably good and whats more important it that it is an 18 - 70mm lens unlike most kit lenses that do only 18-55mm.
^ yeah, the in-body IS and Sony’s Live View implementation were the key factors that convinced me to get it, after comparing with the Nikon and Canon models.
^^ Though the A200 makes up for that slightly by providing a brighter and larger viewfinder. IMHO I really don’t know how people can use only the viewfinder all the time.
Sure it helps in stabilizing the camera, but I hate it because it doesn’t provide a 100% field of view but between approximately 91 - 95% on budget SLRs. So the picture you click is not the same picture that you see in your viewfinder.
I just wish the Pentax K200D had Live View. It would have solved all my problems ! It has one of the better kit lenses and it is weather sealed to boot.
Agreed the live view is awesome but the normal optical viewfinder which essentially is the heart and soul of the camera is absolute rubbish compared to the Canikons.