Windows Vista's recommended settings according to Microsoft

Microsoft today will unveil a new website aimed at informing consumers about Windows Vista’s hardware requirements, among other things. As we reported earlier, there are two levels of recommendations for Windows Vista, those dubbed “Vista-Capable” and those dubbed “Premium-Ready.” Microsoft has now revealed the specs in each category, and here they are:

[B]Minimum Requirements (Vista-Capable PCs):

[ul]

[li]800 MHz Intel-compatible processor[/li]
[li]512MB of RAM[/li]
[li]DirectX 9.0-Capable Graphics Processor[/li]
[li]20GB HD[/li]
[/ul]

Recommended Requirements (Premium-Ready PCs):

[ul]

[li]1 GHz Intel-compatible processor[/li]
[li]1GB RAM[/li]
[li]DirectX 9.0-Capable Graphics Processor, with 128MB graphics memory. (64MB of graphics memory to support a single monitor less than 1,310,720 pixels [no more than 1440x900]; 128MB of graphics memory to support a single monitor at resolutions from 1,310,720 to 2,304,000 pixels [no more than 1920x1200]; 256MB of graphics memory to support a single monitor at resolutions higher than 2,304,000 pixels [more than 1920x1200]).[/li]
[li]40GB HD with at least 15GB “free space”[/li]
[/ul][/B]

What’s the difference between the two recommendations? Machines that are only “Vista Capable” can indeed run Vista, but as we reported earlier, those machines will not be able to run the new Aero user interface.

For the PC enthusiast, the specifications—even for the “premium” experience—are tame. Joe Consumer might not feel the same way, however. 1GB of system RAM has not been common in default OEM configurations from companies such as Dell until recently, although most have been eager to sell upgrades. In fact, while 1GB of RAM is standard across Dell’s popular XPS line, their bargain-oriented “Basic Desktops” still come standard with 256MB or 512MB of RAM, although upgrades are still possible. (I shudder at the thought of running Windows XP with only 256MB or 512MB of RAM!)

[B] http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060518-6863.html

http://windowsvista.com/getready [/B]

as always the devil is in the details. What does it mean by DirectX 9.0 Graphics processor the ‘Vista capable’ series. Does this include the i915 or 939 socket chipsets or what?

dude that is the gpu, not the cpu socket or chipset, so u should hv a dx9.0 complaint gpu. …gat it.

feeling sad :frowning:

40gb hdd with 15gb free space. how big is this gonna be. seems like i have to change my partition size once vista comes.

I never knew that windows vista was a 3d game.

Recommended Requirements (Premium-Ready PCs):
1 GHz Intel-compatible processor
1GB RAM
DirectX 9.0-Capable Graphics Processor, with 128MB graphics memory. (64MB of graphics memory to support a single monitor less than 1,310,720 pixels [no more than 1440x900]; 128MB of graphics memory to support a single monitor at resolutions from 1,310,720 to 2,304,000 pixels [no more than 1920x1200]; 256MB of graphics memory to support a single monitor at resolutions higher than 2,304,000 pixels [more than 1920x1200]).
40GB HD with at least 15GB "free space

Man dat`s asking a lot

I dont think the specs are all that demanding, considering 512 RAM is the recommended amount for XP nowadays. And u can always turn off Aero so the requirements are even less. Sure 1 GB on Vista wont be the best experience. The sweet spot would probably be 2 GB. But the days are numbered until enthusiasts start stuffing their PC’s with 4 GB of memory.

:lol: Well said!!! The requirements are huuuge…and this is for an OS,.. not some game or something.

this is Operating System or what ???
u need a 7800 gt to run an os !!! this is insane .. :mad:
again 15 gb installation :@ (almost 4 DVDs)
Linuxsuse with every possible codecs and compilers and developing softwrs doesnt take half that space …

^^ Lol, I guess the Vista DVD version will be more common :wink:

And the requirements sound pretty ok to me, and if your complaining, then Aero 3D aint for you…

Yeah same here…:frowning:

Who said u need a 7800 GT?? It’ll run fine on a fx5200/x300. And the installation will most prob take up all of one DVD. Windows XP takes up about 1.5 GB on disk but just uses one CD. Remember one thing, Vista is releasing in 2007, thats about eight months away. Its not like its releasing overnight. Don get me wrong im not supporting them or something but i just don think all this uproar over its requirements is justified.

i dont think there is a requirement to shift from my XP environment …it’d take atleast 2 more years for other companies to start developing apps that would run exclusively for vista

exactly…for XP to become so common, it took ages… same way, most people wont shift to Vista immediately. It will take time to gain mass acceptance. s

it mentions that vista needs 15gb free and not 15gb required. It may be swap.
At the moment the beta 1 takes about 6gb

^^ It says that Vista requires at least 40 GB hdd space and 15 gb for all your frivolus features..

LOL, they’re dreaming if they think even 10% of home PC users know what RAM and GB is, let alone knowing their PC configuration - all the best selling Vista Billy :smiley:

Thats only for Vista premium certification. afaik for vista home basic u dont need that much.

They aren’t supposed to know…

OEM manufacturers will put up configs enough to run Vista and sell 'em…:wink:

Windows System Reqs. 1990-2006: More For Less

The publication Thursday of Windows Vista’s minimum hardware specs is only the last in a long series of requirement postings by Microsoft. To show some perspective, TechWeb compiled the Redmond, Wash. developer’s stated reqs for each major Windows release since 1990’s Windows 3.0.

Caveat: Microsoft is notorious for understating system requirements to pitch Windows to the greatest number, even when that minimum hardware has difficulty actually running the OS. JupiterResearch analyst Joe Wilcox characterized the habit this way on his blog. “You could run Windows on the minimum requirements, but you wouldn’t want to.”